C. H. LITTLE
(From Disputed Doctrines [Burlington, Iowa: Lutheran Literary Board, 1933], pp. 76-79.)
This is a burning question at the present day. Different attitudes are
assumed by various bodies of our Lutheran Church. Some forbid entrance into
lodges by both pastors and laymen. Others forbid entrance into lodges to their
ministers, but make no similar requirement of their laymen. Still others allow
both pastors and laymen to become members of lodges. There is no unity of action
or uniformity in this respect. But there should be. If the lodge is a good
thing, it ought to be encouraged. If it is an evil thing, it ought to be
unqualifiedly condemned. Lodges have been among us for many years, and have been
growing by leaps and bounds in recent years. It ought to be easy to estimate
their influence, and the Church should take a decisive stand.
We Christians have the Word of God for our guide. Let us examine the
lodge in the light of God’s Word. If it is a good thing, let us recommend it to
our people. If it is an evil thing, then let us condemn it, regardless of the
consequences to our Church as an outward organization.
The first and most serious objection to the lodge from the standpoint
of the Scriptures is, that it is a flagrant transgression of the First
Commandment. That Commandment says, “Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.”
The lodge sets up a god for its members to worship as false as any god of pagan
or heathen worship. This god is not the Triune God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,
of our Christian faith, but an imaginary god who has no existence at all. In the
lodge this god is called “the Great Architect of the Universe,” and “the Head of
the Lodge Triumphant.” This is not the true God. The Triune God, whom we as
Christians worship and to whom we pray when we say, “Our Father who art in
heaven,” never introduced the lodge system. He never favored it or sanctioned it
in His Word. He holds no position in it, and it is a blasphemous slander when
the title, “Head of the Lodge Triumphant” is applied to Him. How men with no
warrant from His Word should presume so to address Him passes comprehension. So
far is he removed from all connection with the lodge system that the name of His
well-beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our adorable Redeemer and the only Saviour of
sinners, is excluded from all the major lodges. Just as there was no room for
Him in the inn when He was born into this world, so there is no room for Him in
the lodge. To transgress the First Commandment is the most deadly of all sins;
and the Church is not performing its function or doing its duty when it fails to
warn its members against such transgression.
A second objection to the lodge from the Scriptural standpoint is that
the lodge institutes a false worship. The Lord Jesus Christ quotes the Scripture
as saying, “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve”
[Matthew 4:10]. Now, it is true the lodge disclaims interfering with a man’s
religion. But if this is true, why do the lodges have chaplains and priests and
elaborate rituals and forms of worship? The only answer to this question is that
they have a religion of their own and a worship that is false and deadly. This
must be so, because they serve a false god and exclude from their worship Jesus
Christ, whose name is “the only name under heaven, given among men, whereby we
must be saved” [Acts 4:12]. It is false also because it does not teach salvation
by faith alone in Jesus Christ, but salvation by works. And even these words
need not go beyond the payment of their regular dues to the lodge.
The writer of this article recalls a Masonic burial which he once
witnessed. The man who died had been a Free Mason. Although he was a married man
and had a family, he had been living for thirteen years, up to the time of his
sudden accidental death, in adultery with another woman. He received no
Christian burial; but his brother Masons buried him. They assembled around his
grave with their little aprons and other paraphernalia on and went through their
long ritualistic service; and the chaplain, who led the service, said among
other things, that it had pleased the Great Architect of the Universe and Head
of the Lodge Triumphant to translate our good, departed brother from the lodge
on earth to the lodge above; and all the members present at the grave responded,
“So mote it be.” And this man who had died impenitent in his sins was sent
directly into heaven. He was a member of the lodge and had paid his dues, and
naturally went where all good lodge men go. Is it right for the Church to keep
silent and fail to enter its earnest protest against such deception, which is
subversive of all the fundamental principles of Christianity?
Another objection against the whole lodge system is, that it
introduces a false brotherhood. The only brotherhood recognized in the
Scriptures is the brotherhood of true believers in Jesus Christ. The lodge has
another and a totally different brotherhood. It admits into the membership Jews
and Mohammedans and infidels of all kinds, and Christians. And they must
recognize one another as brethren, and must worship together. Here all
differences are submerged and the Christian is placed on a level with the
unbeliever, contrary to the Scripture which says, “Can two walk together except
they be agreed?” [Amos 3:3] Surely there can be no greater opposition than this
to the apostolic injunction, “Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers”
[2 Corinthians 6:14]. If the Church fails to enter its protest against lodges
which teach such things, it fails in this respect to bear witness to Jesus
Christ, which is its chief function here upon earth.
Many other objections may be brought against the lodge; but surely
those mentioned above are quite sufficient to show that no true intelligent
Christian can participate in the lodge system. Every religion without the Christ
and without the cross is not Divine, but is Satanic.
Carroll Herman Little (1872-1958) was the son of a Tennessee Synod minister and a native of Hickory, North Carolina. He graduated from the General Council’s Mount Airy (Philadelphia) Seminary in 1901, received the honorary degree of Doctor of Divinity from Lenoire-Rhyne College in 1914, and in 1928 received his Doctor of Sacred Theology degree from Chicago Lutheran Seminary. Little served pastorates in Nova Scotia and Ontario, and from 1917 to 1947 was professor of theology in the Evangelical Lutheran Seminary of Canada in Waterloo, Ontario, an institution of the United Lutheran Church in America.